Boer_prisoners_Camp_Bhimtal

Boer POW camps in India

The British took over 25,000 Boer prisoners of war and shipped them to other colonies, while confining civilians, including women and children, in concentration camps in South Africa. The prisoners were sent to India from April 1901 when the facilities in St. Helena, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) and Bermuda became inadequate.

At the end of the war in 1902, 9,125 of the Boer prisoners of war, including some foreign volunteers, were in about twenty cantonments all over India. This was the largest number in any colony: there were nearly 6,000 in St. Helena, 5,126 in Ceylon, over 3,000 in Bermuda and1,733 in South Africa.

Among the prisoners of war in India was Commandant T. F. J. Dreyer, commandant of the Potchefstroom Commando, who served under General Smuts and was captured during the daring raid of 300 miles through British lines in 1901.

One prisoner – J. L. de Villiers managed to escape from the camp at Trichinopoly. Dressed as an Indian, he went to the French colony of Pondicherry and returned to South Africa via France and the Netherlands.
Another prisoner, Commandant Erasmus, a Johannesburg solicitor, took an interest in Indian history, philosophy and literature. He gave a series of lectures on the subject to the Transvaal Philosophical Society: they were published by Gandhi in Indian Opinion.

The Kimberley Public Library has some material in their archives from a Mostert, concerning his experiences as a POW at Ahmednagar.

more
more
bengal-lancers-in-sa

How India Helped Britain Win its ‘Dirty’ War in South Africa

On the last day of May in 1902 one of Britain’s most bitter imperial wars came to an end. The Boer war was fought in South Africa as Britain succeeded, eventually, in extending control from the Cape Province and Natal to include the Boer republics of Transvaal and Orange Free State.

The British Empire won – with India’s help. Indian soldiers served in the Boer War, and a memorial in South Africa commemorates those who lost their lives. And military bases in India were brought into service as detention camps for thousands of Boer prisoners of war (PoWs). Both the role of Indian servicemen and of PoW camps on Indian soil are details largely neglected, even by military historians – but they reflect a crucial element of how Empire worked.

Unusually for a British military adventure, its opponents were European settlers rather than people indigenous to the area being fought over. The Boers were largely of Dutch farming stock; they spoke Afrikaans, still one of South Africa’s principal languages; they were Christian and white; and they were formidable fighters.

The last time Britain had taken up arms against white settlers it hadn’t gone too well – that conflict ended in American independence.

At first, the conflict in South Africa didn’t go too well either.

The Boers of South Africa were agriculturists – the word ‘boer’ means farmer in both Dutch and Afrikaans – and had carved a living from an often inhospitable land. They were tough, clannish and – as so often with settler communities – armed and familiar with using a rifle. They were well placed to turn to guerrilla war and that’s what they did with initial success.

In all, Britain – and its colonies – deployed approaching half-a-million combatants in South Africa – almost ten times the number that the Boers and their allies (several thousand Irish volunteered to go to South Africa to fight the hated Brits) managed to muster. As well as a redoubtable military opponent, the British government faced opposition in another form – many British liberals and leftists felt the war unjust and its prosecution savage and uncivilised. These critics were often called ‘pro-Boer’. It would be more accurate to describe them as perhaps the first mass anti-war movement in the UK.

more
more
Emily Hobhouse

Anglo-Boer war whistle-blower Emily Hobhouse celebrated in Cornish home

Emily Hobhouse
Emily Hobhouse

Series of events mark 165th anniversary of birth of forgotten pacifist who exposed conditions in British concentration camps

She took on the might of establishment and empire to expose the suffering of women and children held in British concentration camps but her story has “faded” from the history books.

From 12 April a series of events are being held at the Cornish home where the pacifist, whistle-blower and activist Emily Hobhouse grew up, around the 165th anniversary of her birth, part of efforts to shine a new light on her fight for justice.

Hobhouse travelled from Cornwall to South Africa at the turn of the 20th century and reported back on the awful conditions endured in the British bell tent camps set up during the Anglo-Boer war, but was dismissed as a “hysterical woman” and a traitor.

Her life and times are being celebrated at a new historical attraction called The Story of Emily at the rectory in St Ive, near Liskeard, where she grew up.

more
more

Wreath laying to commemorate lives lost during Anglo-Boer war

The Alberton Voortrekkers, a cultural organization rooted in Afrikaner heritage, held a wreath-laying ceremony to commemorate lives lost during the Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902). The event, reported recently, honors the memory of those who died, including Boer soldiers, women, and children in British concentration camps, as well as British and other participants. Such ceremonies reflect the Voortrekkers’ commitment to preserving Afrikaner history and remembering the war’s impact on all communities. Specific details about the date, location, or attendees of this particular event are not widely documented in available sources, but it aligns with similar commemorative activities at sites like the Voortrekker Monument in Pretoria, where the war’s toll—over 34,000 deaths in camps alone—is solemnly acknowledged.

more
Boer War Memorial Statue2

Boer War Memorial Statue returns to Sturt Street Gardens

The Boer War Memorial Statue in Ballarat’s Sturt Street Gardens was restored and returned to its site following a $318,000 restoration project, part of a broader $700,000 effort to restore multiple statues in the city. The statue, unveiled in 1906 to commemorate locals who served in the Boer War (1899–1902), had been removed for conservation due to its deteriorating condition, with its foundations deemed beyond repair. A like-for-like bronze replica was created to replace the original, which was made of beaten copper with a hessian and plaster core. The restored memorial was unveiled on June 13, 2025, as announced by Mayor Tracey Hargreaves. The statue, designed by James White, depicts a soldier on horseback rescuing a comrade and holds historical significance, listed on the Victorian War Heritage Inventory.

Voortrekker graveyard in Greylingstad

Voortrekker Graveyard in Greylingstad

The Voortrekker graveyard in Greylingstad, Mpumalanga, South Africa, is a historical cemetery with graves dating back to before the town’s establishment in 1909. Located near the original Greylingstad site, approximately 5 km southeast of the current town, it contains burials significant to the Voortrekker heritage. The graves have been catalogued by the Genealogical Society of South Africa, preserving records of early settlers in the region. Unlike the modern cemetery in Greylingstad, which is still in use, the Voortrekker graveyard holds particular historical interest due to its association with the early Voortrekker movement and the area’s pre-Boer War history

president kruger funeral

president kruger funeral

Paul Kruger, former president of the South African Republic (Transvaal), died in exile in Switzerland on July 14, 1904. His body was initially buried in The Hague, Netherlands, but was repatriated to South Africa with British permission. He received a state funeral in Pretoria on December 16, 1904, with the vierkleur flag of the South African Republic draped over his coffin. After ceremonial lying in state, he was buried in the Heroes’ Acre at the Church Street Cemetery in Pretoria

concentration camps at Heidelberg

Concentration camps at Heidelberg

Heidelberg, South Africa, was the location of concentration camps during the Second Boer War (1899-1902). These camps housed Boer women and children, and also separate camps for Black Africans who were caught up in the conflict. The camps were established as part of the British “scorched earth” policy, which aimed to deprive Boer guerrilla fighters of support. 

Key Points:

  • Two sets of camps:There were separate concentration camps for white and Black populations in the Heidelberg district. 
  • White camps:These camps housed Boer women and children whose farms were destroyed under the scorched earth policy. 
  • Black camps:These camps housed Black Africans who were displaced or seeking refuge, with some working for the British military. 
  • High mortality rates:The camps, particularly the Black camps, suffered from poor sanitation, disease, and high death rates, especially among children. 
  • Legacy:The Heidelberg camps serve as a reminder of the devastating impact of the Second Boer War on civilians and the harsh realities of the conflict. 
  • Cemeteries:Graves of those who died in the camps are located in two cemeteries: the Kloof cemetery and the “camp cemetery” on the road to Nigel. 
  • Limited information:While the history of the white camps is relatively well-documented, information about the Black camps is still being uncovered. 
The Battle of Schuinshoogte

The Battle of Schuinshoogte

The Battle of Schuinshoogte, also known as the Battle of Ingogo, was fought on February 8, 1881, during the First Boer War. It took place north of Newcastle in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. General Sir George Pomeroy Colley, leading British forces, aimed to clear a path along the Newcastle-Mount Prospect road to secure British supply lines and receive reinforcements, as his communications were constantly harassed by Boer patrols under Commandant J.D. Weilbach after their victory at Laing’s Nek.

Colley left Mount Prospect camp with a force primarily composed of infantry, leaving some artillery and a company of the 60th Rifles on a ridge overlooking the Ingogo River. As they advanced, they encountered a Boer force, leading to a fierce engagement. Heavy rain then fell, ending the battle abruptly. The swollen Ingogo River made it difficult to ford, and under cover of night, the British managed a retreat, although some drowned in the river crossing.

This battle resulted in significant British casualties, with seven officers and 66 men killed, and 77 wounded. The Boers, who had eight killed, managed to bury their dead at the farm Geelhoutboom. The failure of the Boers to capture British artillery during the rainstorm is noted as a significant tactical error. Had Colley received his reinforcements before the rain, it’s speculated he might have secured a victory, potentially strengthening British negotiating power in peace talks.

This engagement further demoralized British forces, contributing to the series of defeats they experienced in the First Boer War, culminating in Colley’s death at the Battle of Majuba Hill.

The Battle of Kraaipan

The Battle of Kraaipan

12 October 1899 was where the first shots were fired that marked the start of the Second Anglo-Boer War.
That night 800 men of the Potchefstroom and Lichtenburg commandos under General Koos de la Rey, one of General Piet Cronjé’s field generals, attacked and captured the British garrison and railway siding at Kraaipan between Vryburg and Mafeking, some 60 kilometres south west of Mafeking. Thus began the Second Anglo-Boer War. Under the orders of Cronjé the Mafeking railway and telegraph lines were cut on the same day.
De la Rey and his kommando derailed an armoured train carrying British supplies.

"Geloftedag" or "Dingaansdag,"

Day of the Vow “Geloftedag” or “Dingaansdag,”

The Day of the Vow, known in Afrikaans as “Geloftedag” or “Dingaansdag,” was historically a significant religious and cultural holiday in South Africa, observed on December 16th. Originating from the Battle of Blood River in 1838, it commemorates the victory of approximately 400 Voortrekkers (Afrikaner pioneers) over an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 Zulu warriors. Before this battle, the Voortrekkers made a vow to God that if they were granted victory, they would honor the day as a Sabbath and build a church in gratitude.

During the Apartheid era, this day was officially recognized as a public holiday under various names like Dingane’s Day, Day of the Covenant, or Day of the Vow, emphasizing the Afrikaner victory and their cultural and religious heritage. The holiday was used to assert Afrikaner identity and was seen as a symbol of divine protection over the Afrikaner people.

In 1994, following the end of apartheid, the Day of the Vow was replaced by the Day of Reconciliation, which seeks to foster national unity and racial harmony by acknowledging the historical significance of December 16th for both Afrikaners and black South Africans. This date also marks the establishment of Umkhonto we Sizwe, the armed wing of the African National Congress, in 1961, symbolizing resistance against apartheid.

However, even after the official renaming, some Afrikaners continue to celebrate the Day of the Vow, holding services particularly at the Voortrekker Monument in Pretoria, where they remember their ancestors’ vow and the cultural significance of the event. This dual commemoration reflects the complex history and ongoing cultural identity of different communities within South Africa

boer war facts

The Anglo Boer War, a remarkable chapter in history, reveals astonishing and often overlooked facts that highlight the human cost of conflict. One particularly striking statistic is that far more British troops succumbed to enteric fever and other diseases in South Africa than were lost to enemy action. An astounding 13,000 men and officers tragically died from these invisible foes, while nearly 8,000 lost their lives due to wounds or were killed in combat. In addition to this staggering loss of life, approximately 9,500 soldiers found themselves captured as prisoners of war.

These figures serve as a sobering reminder of the brutal realities faced during the Boer War, showcasing not only the physical struggle against opposing forces but also the relentless battle against disease and hardship. The sheer magnitude of these losses evokes awe at the sacrifices made by those who fought in this tumultuous period. Understanding these aspects enriches our perception of warfare and its impact on humanity, reminding us that every conflict harbors stories far beyond what we see on the battlefield.

The Gun used by many or most of the Boers

Possibly the most important item of equipment the Voortrekkers took with them was their gun,
or rather guns, as they invariably possessed two and very often, more.
The gun was the clumsy “ou Sanna” with a barrel length of from 114 to 166 cms (45 or 60
inches) which could take a round lead ball of either 12 or 10 balls to the pound which indicates
that the bore varied in size.. The barrels were lightly rifled -also in various degrees. Some
would have a straight rifling and others up to three riflings with varying spiralling. These were
the more sophisticated and accurate weapons. In Cape Town Botha en Zoon, P J Botha &
Levick were noted gun makers. There is the record that Louis Trichardt paid 37 riksdaalers (at
15c per riksdaaler in the 1830’s would be R5,55) for a gun by Botha and considered it very
expensive. Of course the trader dealing with the native inhabitants would have guns for which
he paid only a fraction of that amount. This trade was illegal and profits high. The risks to
the trader were considerable should he be caught with guns, powder or lead for sale. The best
overseas guns came from Belgium and Flanders
The Voortrekkers grew up with this unwieldy gun and looked down on the more modern
percussion cap type as used and inspected by Cornwallis Harris who spent some time with the
Voortrekkers in the Free State. They felt his gun was inferior in spite of him shooting a buck
at 400 paces!
The “Ou Sanna” was primed with 4 to 6 grammes of gunpowder which worked out at from 40 to
60 shots to be fired from a pound of gunpowder. The method of loading was important. The
trigger is placed in the safety position; the gun is held in the left hand with the butt resting on
the ground; the barrel to face forward with the gun held on the slant; The powder-horn is
picked up with the right hand and the stopper removed with the thumb; the estimated amount
of powder is poured into the palm of the left hand while the gun rests in the crook of the left
arm; holding the gun upright the powder, or most of it, is poured into the end of the barrel
and the small amount left goes into the pan; now with the right hand withdraw the ram-rod
and tamp the powder down also tapping the butt of the gun on the ground. The powder must
reach the “touch-hole”. Next insert the ‘gad and tamp this down. Now comes the ball, which
is also tapped into position with the ram-rod. In times of haste and tension the wad was
omitted. The protective covering to the priming receptacle is now closed after more
tapping. Should the powder in the receptacle not flow down the touch-hole and make
contact with the powder in the barrel there will be no firing of the gun (hence the expression
“to hang fire” or if the shot misfires “a flash in the pan” The touch hole had to be cleaned
regularly
Supposing all has gone according to plan: The cocking-piece is now pulled back and the trigger
squeezed, this releases the cocking-piece whose flint scrapes against the steel, sparks fly, the
powder in the pan lights, the fire travels down the touch-hole and ignites the charge which
then explodes shooting the bullet and, of course, expels a vast amount of white smoke. During
the battle of Blood River it was fortunate that the enemy retreated fairly frequently to just
beyond rifle range before charging once more. These brief intervals allowed the powdersmoke to clear and allow the defenders to see once more.
Incidentally, at this battle the powder and balls were poured into basins for greater ease of
handling. The balls, slugs or small balls (buck-shot) was sewn in bags by the women – this
speeded up the reloading process. At some battles the women and girls loaded the guns some
of which got so hot that the powder ignited when poured into the barrel. Cleaning of the
barrels had to be done frequently due to the gunpowder fouling the barrels.
The range of the Ou Sanna was roughly 100 paces, but the Voortrekkers invariably allowed the
enemy to approach to within 30 paces. Not only would one shot then kill more than one person
but 30 paces was the range of the assegai.
GUNPOWDER
This was the old black type with little power but a lot of smoke. Not only used in guns but
Andrew Geddes Bain and Thomas Bain used it as an explosive; this was all they had.
Gunpowder came in 600 pound casks and of course, had to be dry or it would not ignite; casks
wrapped in skins did the job well. The Trekkers took as much powder as possible; where they
were going there would be no opportunity to replenish supplies and it was needed for
protection against wild animals, unfriendly people and to shoot game for the pot. When the
British put an embargo on taking powder and lead out of the Colony ways had to be found to get
it across the Orange River. Naturally they succeeded, they just had to!
That there were not more accidents is quite remarkable. There is an account of a wagon
catching alight which set the gunpowder off killing nine persons and injuring a further 12
THE BULLETS
These, in the main, were cast of lead and made in the field as and when they were needed.
But, like powder, lead was a scarce commodity. The lead was heated in pots and the melted
lead then ladled into the bullet-moulds then plunged into a bucket of cold water for cooling.
The pincers – resembling small ice cream spoons, had a cutting edge to nip off the small
extrusion of lead from the pouring spout. The round balls could either be used as they were
or have a x cut into them. On firing this ball would divide into 4 pieces. Smaller pellets, sewn
in bags, would have the same effect
So scarce was lead that on shooting a buck every effort was made to retrieve the bullet.

Colonel Graham (Grahamstown), Warrant of Payment

 In 1812 John Graham undertook the task which was to define his military career, he was sent with British regulars and Boer commandos to clear around 20,000 Xhosa settled in the Zuurveld ( Albany) which lay beyond the Cape Colony’s frontiers. On completion of this ‘clearing’ he established Graham’s Town as the Zuurveld’s central military post. The same year, 1812, he returned to England and  later accompanied his cousin General Thomas Graham, 1st Baron Lynedoch  to Holland as his aide-de-camp and private military secretary